COVID-19 hospital worker infections prompt ventilation audit
Save articles for later
Add articles to your saved list and come back to them any time.
The ventilation systems of Victorian hospitals are set to be audited amid suspicions coronavirus particles could have travelled through the air, infecting hospital workers who had no close contact with sick patients.
It is estimated that 2600 Victorian nurses, doctors and other health staff caught the virus while at work. But that statistic does not include support staff, such as cleaners and administration workers, and it's now claimed that hundreds of people in these roles had also been infected, adding to concerns that poor airflow in facilities could be an issue, not just droplets from a cough or sneeze or contaminated surfaces.
The Royal Melbourne Hospital in Parkville.Credit:Pat Scala
Andrew Hewat, assistant secretary of the Victorian Allied Health Professionals Association, said he was recently involved in a briefing that was told about 500 support staff working in health services had been infected with the coronavirus.
"They would be food service monitors, the ward clerks, the patient services assistants and the cleaners," he said.
The debate around how the coronavirus spreads has major ramifications for how the disease is managed and whether protection afforded to health workers at higher risk of catching the virus has been adequate.
However, Australia's Deputy Chief Medical Officer Nick Coatsworth told The Age that while poor ventilation was a “potential factor” in coronavirus spread, cases where administration and other support staff had caught the disease was not proof of it.
"That’s completely flawed logic," he said.
He said a receptionist might have caught the virus from touching something an infected colleague had, such as a computer keyboard.
Dr Coatsworth said it remained the position of the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee and the Infection Control Expert Group that the main causes of transmission of coronavirus was not aerosol spread, but direct contact with an infected person and respiratory droplets.
These droplets could be spread by talking, shouting, singing, coughing or sneezing.
He said aerosol transmission was also accepted in some select circumstances.
Dr Coatsworth said at one hospital there had been assumptions that inadequate personal protective equipment led to the spread of coronavirus.
"Then it become very clear with the in-depth investigation that the transmission event occurred when people had taken their [protective equipment] off and were in close contact, without PPE on," he said.
In August, Victorian health officials highlighted emerging evidence regarding aerosol spread and the risks posed by poor airflow.
During a major outbreak at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, which resulted in 262 worker infections, including 44 cases among security, food administration and other support staff, a decision was made to close some wards in the hospital, first constructed in 1944, after an assessment of patient placement and air circulation.
Professor Malcolm Sim sits on the Victorian government taskforce charged with preventing health worker infections, along with Chief Health Officer Brett Sutton, Dr Coatsworth and dozens of other experts.
It is believed that the risk of catching coronavirus on a plane is relatively low and Professor Sim, the president of the Australasian Faculty of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, said the good ventilation and a high turnover of air in aircraft could be key.
"There is increasing evidence that ventilation rates, especially in crowded indoor spaces, is really key to reducing the chances and risk of infection," Professor Sim said.
"There's been a paper drawn up by the taskforce to set up some key criteria around how ventilation systems should be operating and to do an audit of hospitals to see if their ventilation systems are up to scratch."
Mr Hewat, who also sits on the taskforce, said that in one Victorian nursing home, air had been coming out of a resident's room and funnelled into the corridor where the nursing station was.
"It's just spreading the virus, and all the staff got infected," he said.
He said the audit of ventilation systems would establish sites that did have adequate ventilation, which could be used in any future outbreaks.
Experts have complained about the lack of detail in the data published about infections among Victoria's healthcare workers to date, though there are now respective interviews and a data team attempting to provide further answers to how 3574 workers caught the virus.
There is just now one active case in this group, out of 15 cases in Victoria.
The Victorian Health Department have begun a new analysis of the source of healthcare worker infections, the characteristics of workers that have been affected, the patterns of transmission and the settings in which outbreaks have occurred.
"The Victorian government has further increased PPE guidance to include all scenarios where care is provided to probable, suspected and confirmed COVID patients, regardless of the amount of time in contact," a spokesman said.
Sign up to our Coronavirus Update newsletter
Get our Coronavirus Update newsletter for the day’s crucial developments at a glance, the numbers you need to know and what our readers are saying. Sign up to The Sydney Morning Herald’s newsletter here and The Age’s here.
Most Viewed in National
Source: Read Full Article